Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices July 5 – July 8 2011

Tuesday July 5, 2011

Proposed Rules

  1. Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes. 14 CFR Part 39
    [Docket No. FAA–2011–0650; Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–257–AD]. Proposed rule. We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
    products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing
    airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: [T]he FAA has published SFAR 88 (Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88). In their letters referenced 04/00/02/07/01– L296, dated March 4th, 2002, and 04/00/02/07/03–L024, dated February 3rd, 2003, the [Joint Aviation Authorities] JAA recommended the application of a similar regulation to the National Aviation Authorities (NAA).
    Under this regulation, all holders of type certificates for passenger transport aircraft with either a passenger capacity of 30 or more, or a payload capacity of 3,402 kg (7,500 lb) or more which have received their certification since January 1st, 1958, are required to conduct a design review against explosion risks.* * * * *
    The unsafe condition is insufficient electrical bonding of the over-wing refueling cap adapter, which could result in a possible fuel ignition source in the fuel tanks. The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 19, 2011.
  2. Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) BR700–710 Series Turbofan Engines. 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2011–0684; Directorate Identifier 2010–NE–27–AD]. Proposed rule. We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct
    an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: Analysis of service data carried out by Rolls-Royce Deutschland has shown that the effect of touch-and-go and overshoot on life cycle counting is higher than anticipated. Therefore, the life cycle counting method for touch-and-go and overshoot as defined by the Time Limits Manual needs to be changed to reflect this higher effect on life. We are proposing this AD to prevent failure of high-energy, life-limited parts, uncontained engine failure, and damage to the airplane. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 19, 2011.
  3. Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Lebanon, PA. 14 CFR Part 71
    [Docket No. FAA–2011–0558; Airspace Docket No. 11–AEA–13]. Proposed rule. This action proposes to establish Class E Airspace at Lebanon, PA, to  accommodate new Standard Instrument Approach Procedures at Keller Brothers Airport. This action would enhance the safety and airspace management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport. DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 19, 2011.
  4. Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review. [FTA Docket No. FTA–2011–0038 ]. Notice. The Federal Transit Administration invites public comment about our intention to request the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) approval to renew the following information collection: 49 U.S.C. Sections 5309 and 5307 Capital Assistance Programs The information collected on the
    certification forms is necessary for FTA’s grantees to meet the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5323(m). The Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment
    period soliciting comments was published on April 26, 2011 (Citation 76
    FR 23354). No comments were received from that notice.DATES: Comments must be submitted before August 4, 2011. A comment to OMB is most effective if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication.

Wednesday July 06, 2011

Final rules.

  1. Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4–600R
    Series Airplanes, and Model C4–605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called
    A300–600 Series Airplanes); and Model A310 Series Airplanes
    . 14 CFR Part 39
    [Docket No. FAA–2010–1197; Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–044–AD;  Amendment 39–16736; AD 2011–14–01]. Final rule. We are adopting a new
    airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results
    from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: An operator of an A300–600 aeroplane reported finding a cracked pylon fuel drain pipe on engine #1. * * * * * * The pipe drains the double wall of the wing-to-pylon junction in the event of fuel leakage. After investigation, it was concluded that
    the damage of the pylon fuel drain pipe had been caused by chafing of the pipe against over-length screws that had been installed in accordance with the Illustrated Parts Catalogue (IPC) during a maintenance phase of the Lower Aft Pylon Fairing (LAPF). This condition, if not detected and corrected, could, in combination with fuel leakage in the pylon, lead to an accumulation of fuel in the lowest point of the LAPF. As high temperatures are present within the LAPF, and without ventilation, this could result in fuel (vapour) ignition and consequent fire. * * * * * We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: This AD becomes effective August 10, 2011.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of August 10, 2011.
  2. Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model DC–9–81 (MD–81), DC–9–82 (MD–82), DC–9–83 (MD–83), DC–9–87 (MD–87), and MD–88 Airplanes. 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2010–1203; Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–168–AD; Amendment 39–16738; AD 2011–14–03]. Final rule. We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD requires repetitive inspections for cracking of the left and right upper center skin panels of the horizontal stabilizer, and corrective action if necessary. This AD was prompted by a report of a crack found in the upper center skin panel at the aft inboard corner of a right horizontal stabilizer. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracks in the horizontal stabilizer upper center skin panel. Uncorrected cracks might ultimately lead to the loss of overall structural integrity of the horizontal stabilizer. DATES: This AD is effective August 10, 2011. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of August 10, 2011.
  3. [Docket No. FAA–2011–0152; Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–079–AD;  Amendment 39–16739; AD 2011–14–04]. 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2011–0152; Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–079–AD; Amendment 39–16739; AD 2011–14–04]. Final rule. We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
    product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: On some Falcon 7X aeroplanes, it has been determined potential low clearance between electrical wiring or hydraulic pipe and nearby structure. Although no in service incident has been reported, there is no certainty that the minimum clearances would be maintained over time. In the worst case, interference or contact with structure might occur and lead to electrical short circuits or fluid leakage, potentially resulting in loss of several functions essential for safe flight. * * * * * We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: This AD becomes effective August 10, 2011. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of August 10, 2011.
  4. Airworthiness Directives; Schweizer Aircraft Corporation (Schweizer) Model 269A, A–1, B, C, C–1, and TH–55 Series Helicopters. 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2011–0593; Directorate Identifier 2011–SW–002–AD; Amendment 39–16723; AD 2011–12–16]. Final rule. We are superseding an existing emergency airworthiness directive (EAD) for the specified Schweizer model helicopters that was previously sent to all known U.S. owners and operators. That EAD currently requires removing each locknut and verifying sufficient drag torque and retorquing, or if the locknut does not have sufficient drag torque, replacing the locknut with an airworthy locknut. This AD retains the existing
    EAD requirements but also requires within a specified time, modifying the
    expandable bolts and installing a cotter pin. This AD is prompted by a locknut
    working loose from a bolt attaching the tailboom support strut at the aft cluster
    fitting because the locknut installed on the expandable bolt did not have the proper threads. We are issuing this AD to modify each expandable bolt to allow
    adding a cotter pin to prevent the strut and driveshaft separating from the
    helicopter and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. DATES: This AD is effective July 21, 2011. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of July 21, 2011. We must receive any comments on this AD by September 6, 2011.
  5. Establishment of Class E Airspace; Brunswick, ME. 14 CFR Part 71 [Docket No. FAA–2011–0116; Airspace Docket No. 11–ANE–1]. Final rule. This action corrects the effective date of a final rule that was published in the Federal Register on June 22, 2011, that establishes Class E airspace at Brunswick Executive Airport, Brunswick, ME. DATES: The effective date is moved from
    0901 UTC, August 25, 2011, to 0901 UTC, July 28, 2011.
  6. Manual Requirements. 14 CFR Part 91 [Docket No. FAA–2001–11133; Amendment No. 91–323]. Final rule. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is making a minor technical change to a final rule published in the Federal Register on July 27, 2004. This final rule established new requirements for the certification, operation, and maintenance of lightsport aircraft under several regulations. In the final rule, the FAA inadvertently did not change an affected regulatory reference in one section. The FAA is issuing this technical amendment to correct that oversight. DATES: Effective Dates: This rule becomes effective on August 5, 2011.

Thursday July 07, 2011

Rules

  1. Special Conditions: Boeing Model 787– 8 Airplane; Interaction of Systems and Structures, Electronic Flight Control System-Control Surface Awareness, High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF) Protection, Limit Engine Torque Loads for Sudden Engine Stoppage, and Design Roll Maneuver Requirement. [Docket No. NM362; Special Conditions No. 25–354A–SC]. Final rule. These amended special
    conditions are issued to the Boeing Model 787–8 airplane. This airplane will have novel or unusual design features when compared to the state of technology envisioned in the airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes. These design features include limit engine torque loads for sudden engine stoppage.
    Special Conditions No. 25–354–SC was issued on July 18, 2007, addressing, in
    part, this condition. We have determined that more clarification is needed on the limit engine torque loads for sudden engine stoppage special conditions, and have therefore added a new requirement. This additional requirement has been applied, via special conditions, to other programs. Since applicable airworthiness
    regulations, including those contained in Special Conditions No. 25–354–SC,
    do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this particular
    design feature, these amended special conditions contain the additional safety
    standards which the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of
    safety equivalent to that established by the existing standards. DATES: Effective Date: August 8, 2011.

Proposed rules

  1. Special Conditions: Pratt and Whitney Canada Model PT6C–67E Turboshaft
    Engine
    . 14 CFR Part 33 [Docket No. NE133; Notice No. 33–11–02– SC]. Proposed rule. This action proposes special conditions for Pratt and Whitney
    Canada (PWC) model PT6C–67E engines. The engine model will have a novel or unusual design feature which is a 30-Minute All Engines Operating (AEO) power rating. This rating is primarily intended for high power hovering operations during search and rescue missions. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These proposed special conditions contain the added safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards. DATES: We must receive your comments by August 8, 2011.

Notices

  1. Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received. [Summary Notice No. PE–2011–29]. Notice. This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
    from specified requirements of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The
    purpose of this notice is to improve the public’s awareness of, and participation
    in, this aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition. DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket number and must be received by July 27, 2011.
  2. Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received. [Summary Notice No. PE–2011–32]. Notice. This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
    from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to improve
    the public’s awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition. DATE: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket number involved and must be received on or before July 27, 2011.
  3. Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received. [Summary Notice No. PE–2011–32]. Notice. This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
    from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to improve
    the public’s awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition. DATE: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket number involved and must be received on or before July 27, 2011.

Friday July 08, 2011

Rules

  1. Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce plc (RR) RB211–524 Series Turbofan Engines. 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2011–0624; Directorate Identifier 2010–NE–11–AD; Amendment 39– 16724; AD 2011–13–01]. Final rule. We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
    An investigation into the loss of a TRU during landing has revealed that this  incident was preceded by the detachment of the TRUs fixed structure front ring rivet lines on the rear flange. It was concluded that the loss of rivet lines was directly associated with a previous translating cowl gearbox stubshaft fracture and the subsequent repair of the fixed structure to Engine Manual repair No.
    FRS5887. This repair instructs the replacement of the damaged section of the
    structure but does not require the rivets adjacent to the repair to be replaced although latest analysis has shown that the rivets may have weakened as a result of a translating cowl gearbox stubshaft failure. We are issuing this AD to prevent
    failure of the attachment rivets resulting in loss of engine structural integrity,
    which may result in release of the thrust reverser unit from the engine. DATES: This AD becomes effective August 12, 2011. We must receive comments on this
    AD by August 8, 2011. The Director of the Federal Register approved the  incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of August 12, 2011.
  2. Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca S.A. ARRIEL 2B and 2B1 Turboshaft Engines. 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2011–0115; Directorate Identifier 2010–NE–40–AD; Amendment 39– 16728; AD 2011–13–05]. Final rule. We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
    Several cases of Gas Generator (GG) Turbine Blade rupture occurred in service on ARRIEL 2 twin engine applications and recently one on a single engine  helicopter. For the case occurring in flight on a single engine helicopter (ARRIEL 2B1 engine), the pilot performed an emergency autorotation, landing the  helicopter without further incident. We are issuing this AD to prevent rupture of a GG turbine blade, which could result in an uncommanded inflight shutdown and an emergency autorotation landing or accident. DATES: This AD becomes effective August 12, 2011. The Director of the Federal Register approved the
    incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of August 12, 2011.
  3. Airworthiness Directives; Various Aircraft Equipped With Rotax Aircraft Engines 912 A Series Engine. 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2011–0714; Directorate
    Identifier 2011–CE–024–AD; Amendment 39–16744; AD 2011–14–09]. Final rule.  We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above that will supersede an existing AD. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: During a production process review, a
    deviation in hardening of certain Part Number (P/N) 944072 washers has been
    detected, which exceeds the hardness of the design specification. The affected washers are part of the magneto ring flywheel hub installation and have been installed on a limited number of engines. No defective washers have been
    shipped as spare parts. This condition, if not corrected, could lead to cracks in the washer, loosening of the magneto flywheel hub and consequent ignition failure, possibly resulting in damage to the engine, in-flight engine shutdown and
    forced landing, damage to the aeroplane and injury to occupants. This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. DATES: This AD becomes effective July 25, 2011. As of June 16, 2011 (76 FR 31465, June 1, 2011), the Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of Rotax Aircraft Engines Mandatory Service Bulletin SB–912–058 SB–914–041, dated April 15, 2011, listed in this AD. We must receive comments on this AD by August 22, 2011.

Proposed rules

  1. Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model MD–90–30 Airplanes. 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2011–0652; Directorate Identifier 2010–NM– 045–AD]. Proposed rule. We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Model MD–90–30 airplanes. This proposed AD would require repetitive eddy current high frequency (ETHF) inspections for cracking on the aft side of the left and right wing rear spar lower caps at station Xrs = 164.000, further ETHF inspections if cracks are found, and repair if necessary. This proposed AD would also require repetitive postrepair inspections and repair if necessary. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of cracks of the wing rear spar lower cap at the outboard flap, inboard drive hinge at station Xrs = 164.000. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracking of the left and right rear spar lower caps, which could result in fuel leaks and damage to the wing skin or other structure, and consequent loss of the structural integrity of the wing. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 22, 2011.
  2. Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aerona´ utica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model EMB–505 Airplanes. 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2011–0713;  Directorate Identifier 2011–CE–023–AD]. Proposed rule. We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This proposed
    AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct
    an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
    condition as: It has been found the possibility of freeplay between the mass balance weight and the elevator structure. This condition if not corrected could lead to elevator flutter and possible loss of airplane control. The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 22, 2011.
  3. Airworthiness Directives; Learjet Inc. Model 45 Airplanes. 14 CFR Part 39
    [Docket No. FAA–2011–0651; Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–041–AD]. Proposed rule. We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
    products listed above. This proposed AD would require revising the maintenance program to incorporate life limits for the main landing gear (MLG) actuator end cap. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of the potential for fatigue cracking of the end cap of the MLG prior to the published life limitation. We are proposing this AD to prevent fatigue cracking of the end cap of the MLG, which could result in the failure of the MLG actuator upon landing, and failure of the MLG to extend or retract during flight. DATES: We must receive comments on
    this proposed AD by August 22, 2011.
  4. Proposed Amendment of Class D and Modification of Class E Airspace; Grand Junction, CO. 14 CFR Part 71 [Docket No. FAA–2011–0425; Airspace Docket No. 11–ANM–9]. Proposed rule. This action proposes to modify Class E airspace at Grand Junction Regional Airport, Grand Junction, CO. Additional controlled
    airspace is necessary to facilitate vectoring of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) traffic from Grand Junction Regional Airport to en route. The FAA is proposing this action to enhance the safety and management of aircraft operations at Grand Junction Regional Airport. This action also would amend Class D and Class E airspace to update the airport name from Grand Junction, Walker Field. DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 22, 2011.
  5. Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Tonopah, NV. 14 CFR Part 71
    [Docket No. FAA–2011–0490; Airspace Docket No. 11–AWP–5]. Proposed rule. This action proposes to modify Class E airspace at Tonopah Airport, Tonopah, NV. Controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate aircraft using a new Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning System (GPS) standard instrument approach procedures at Tonopah Airport, Tonopah, NV. The FAA is proposing
    this action to enhance the safety and management of aircraft operations at the
    airport. This action also would make a minor adjustment to the geographic
    coordinates of the airport. DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 22, 2011.

Notices

  1. Pilot Program on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Long- Haul Trucking Provisions. [Docket No FMCSA–2011–0097]. Notice. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) announces its intent to proceed with the initiation of a United States-Mexico cross-border long-haul trucking pilot program to test and demonstrate the ability of Mexico-domiciled motor
    carriers to operate safely in the United States beyond the municipalities in the
    United States on the United States- Mexico international border or the commercial zones of such municipalities (border commercial zones). DATES: This notice is effective July 8, 2011.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>